Well, I couldn't convince you could I?
I am serious about the not reading part. Will get to that in a while.
Over the last 4 weeks since the Airtel 'Zero' / Flipkart fracas broke out and my Facebook wall started getting inundated with 'views' and 'opinions' and 'expert thought' type things, I have watched myself behaving like one of those bobble-head dolls when it comes to my take on the issue as people have professed support both for and against. And that's because it's taken me time and reading to truly understand what is being discussed. And I have a feeling some of us haven't fully understood it.
At first glance, Airtel 'Zero' appears to be a clever move by Airtel to create a win-win-win for self-consumers-marketers where Airtel wants to make more money-consumers don't want to keep paying more money [even as they consume more data]-marketers, on the back of some pretty aggressive fund-raising, are willing to pay good money to build audience reach and engagement [esp. with Mobile Apps].
A good example would be the company Freecharge that Kunal [whose chops I have a lot of respect for] and Sandeep started in 2010. The idea was simple - brands want to acquire customers and get them to keep coming back, and are willing to incentivize this behaviour and even pay for distributing the incentive. So effectively, users who recharged their pre-paid mobile accounts on Freecharge received all their money back in the form of gift vouchers from these brands that have partnered with Freecharge. Soon, word spread about 'this site that was giving everyone a 'free' recharge and the rest is history.
Back to Airtel 'Zero', Flipkart, I am guessing without any access to non-public info, decided to test this out as just a marketing tactic to drive MAUs of the app [remember: no reason to believe free data access would mean better visitor-to-buyer conversion rates]. And that's around the time when sh** hit the fan with folks across the internet calling this a violation of Net Neutrality. But is it?
Net Neutrality, a term coined by Tim Wu, a Columbia University professor in 2003, implies internet service providers [or any other intermediaries in the chain] don't discriminate one form of data consumption from another either basis data-type, location of the user, device type of the user, or pretty much any factor. Basically, the Net Neutrality principle is the universe's way of telling ISPs to do a good job of proving humanity access to the internet [and pls do make money while doing it] and not get into the specifics of who/how someone is using it.
You convinced Net Neutrality is necessary? Yes, you can skip the rest of this post :-) You aren't convinced? Follow me.
In 2011, Eli Pariser, the co-founder of Upworthy [Notice those "you will not believe..." headlines on your news-feed? Well, Upworthy is kinda the creator of that] gave an amazing TED talk on how Google's [and by my extension, the internet's] efforts to personalize each user's experience was creating world-views unique to each of us. Example, if I visit NY Times and a week later search for news surrounding an event, guess which site is most probably going to rank pretty well in my results. I am not kidding. I don't when it comes to Google. Here. Now, let me say 'personalized search' is great at making my life simple. After all, if Google [or any search engine for that matter] can figure out I visit NYT.com pretty frequently, I'd be glad if Google gave me results for relevant searches that prominently included links from NYT.
Now here's the critical part - my 'personalized experience' is essentially guidance on what content I consume which will define my view on that topic. And so with your personalized experience. Now combine all the topics that you and me consume information on and all the different takeaways you and I have about each of those topics and you can bet good money you and I are going to see the world very differently, you and I are going to be operating within the same universe of facts but interpret them and other truths surrounding them differently.
Just like someone reading this post will have a view on the concept of Net Neutrality different from someone who didn't. And that, I am hoping you will agree, is a sub-optimal outcome for nature.
And this is why I was trying to tell you not to read this post. To maintain information symmetry in the universe. But now that you have gone ahead and read it [either that or you scrolled down looking for funny videos], share it [to keep things on an even keel you know].
But what does all of those have to do with the on-going discussion about Airtel 'Zero', Net Neutrality, Internet.org and the TRAI consultation paper? Part deux coming up.